Mohammed HijabCan a necessary being be caused in any sense? Yes, hypostatically. Then you're out of order. You're out of order because you're out of order and you don't know what you're talking about. A necessary being cannot be caused in any sense. It's the consensus of logicians. You're out of order.
Mohammed HijabYou're absolutely out of order. You're absolutely out of order for you to say, "Yeah, that is ridiculous." So, your God is dependent, is he? Refute me. Refute me. The Quran refutes you by telling you clearly, "Qul huwallahu ahad." Say he's Allah, one and only. "Allahu samad." He is the independent. "Lam yalid walam yulad." He begets not nor is he begotten. "Walam yakun lahu kufuwan ahad." And there's nothing like him.
Mohammed HijabWhy is Allah telling us that he's independent and then telling us he does not beget nor is he begotten? Because it's clear that people like you unfortunately believe it's possible to be independent and dependent at the same time. Allah is telling us, and this is in line with classical logic, which you've already rejected today, that it's impossible to be independent and dependent at the same time in any respect, in even 1% respect. You cannot be a necessary or independent being in any respect, in any respect, and then have 1% dependency. You can't have 1% dependency. You cannot have hypostatic dependency. You cannot have essential dependency. You cannot have attributional dependency. You cannot have any level ontological dependency. And if you believe that you can, then you are putting two things together which contradict. You're out of order because you're a fool. You're an idiot.